Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Scotch-Irish
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.040%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.3% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 19.2% |
| Median | 12.0% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |