Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Scotch-Irish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Scotch-Irish
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,452,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,595,685 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.2% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 20.1% |
| Median | 10.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Scotch-Irish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |