Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Native/Alaskan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Native/Alaskan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Natives/Alaskans
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Native/Alaskan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,476,258 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 44.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 50.5% |
| Range | 28.3% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 25.5% |
| Median | 12.0% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 31.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |