Immigrants from Philippines vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Scotch-Irish
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,914,700 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 10.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Scotch-Irish |
Minimum | 0.57% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 19.2% | 97.4% |
Mean | 10.4% | 19.2% |
Median | 11.0% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |