Immigrants from Lithuania vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Scotch-Irish
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,711,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 17.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 25.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.8% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 19.2% |
| Median | 8.3% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |