Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Brazilian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Brazilian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Brazilians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Brazilian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 30.6% |
| Range | 28.3% | 29.9% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 12.5% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Brazilians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |