Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chippewa
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,800,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 32.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 62.5% |
Range | 23.9% | 57.4% |
Mean | 10.2% | 22.5% |
Median | 9.4% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 29.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |