Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zimbabweans
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,800,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 8.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 18.8% |
Range | 23.9% | 17.7% |
Mean | 10.2% | 8.1% |
Median | 9.4% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |