Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chippewa
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,340,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 30.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.0% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 62.5% |
Range | 20.0% | 57.4% |
Mean | 12.3% | 22.5% |
Median | 12.1% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 29.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |