Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,595,685 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 32.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 96.8% | 57.4% |
| Mean | 20.1% | 22.5% |
| Median | 13.3% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |