Ute vs Chippewa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Chippewa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Chippewa
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chippewa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,650,694 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 11.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 59.1% | 62.5% |
| Range | 55.6% | 57.4% |
| Mean | 23.3% | 22.5% |
| Median | 17.9% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.0% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |