Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Immigrants from Belarus
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Immigrants from Belarus
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
65.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,800,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.12% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 26.1% |
Range | 23.9% | 25.9% |
Mean | 10.2% | 10.6% |
Median | 9.4% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |