Ecuadorian vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Puget Sound Salish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Puget Sound Salish
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Puget Sound Salish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,514,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,876,308 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 22.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 2.4% | 6.4% |
Maximum | 62.8% | 35.8% |
Range | 60.4% | 29.3% |
Mean | 20.7% | 16.6% |
Median | 18.7% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.2% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 7.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Liberia (19.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Potawatomi (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Liberian (19.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.0% |
Alsatians | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
French American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.3% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Venezuela (15.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (15.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Brazilian (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |