Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Tsimshian
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,352,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.57% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 19.0% | 22.7% |
Range | 18.4% | 18.9% |
Mean | 7.9% | 9.9% |
Median | 7.6% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |