Costa Rican vs Hungarian Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Hungarian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Hungarians
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Hungarian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,863,259 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.15%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Hungarian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 39.8% | 64.2% |
Range | 37.4% | 62.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 16.8% |
Median | 10.2% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Hungarians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |