Costa Rican vs Pennsylvania German Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Pennsylvania German
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Pennsylvania Germans
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
60.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Pennsylvania German Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,033,089 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.14%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 39.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.4% | 97.6% |
Mean | 10.8% | 18.1% |
Median | 10.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 20.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Pennsylvania Germans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Nepal (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ethiopian (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 56.5 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |