Costa Rican vs Afghan Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Afghan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Afghans
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Afghan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Afghan |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 39.8% | 30.8% |
Range | 37.4% | 30.0% |
Mean | 10.8% | 12.1% |
Median | 10.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Afghans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |