Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Guyana
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Guyana |
Minimum | 6.5% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 69.6% | 52.6% |
Range | 63.1% | 52.3% |
Mean | 25.8% | 19.9% |
Median | 22.6% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |