Costa Rican vs Northern European Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Northern European
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Northern Europeans
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Northern European Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,261,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 0.26%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Northern European |
Minimum | 6.5% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 69.6% | 57.3% |
Range | 63.1% | 54.0% |
Mean | 25.8% | 28.3% |
Median | 22.6% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 34.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Northern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |