Costa Rican vs Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from North America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from North America
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,673,972 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from North America |
Minimum | 6.5% | 17.0% |
Maximum | 69.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.1% | 83.0% |
Mean | 25.8% | 49.1% |
Median | 22.6% | 41.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 70.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 47.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 28.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from North America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |