Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Afghan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Afghan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Afghans
12.0%
POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Afghan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,765,120 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.16%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Afghan |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 30.8% |
Range | 23.9% | 30.0% |
Mean | 10.5% | 12.1% |
Median | 10.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Afghans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |