Chinese vs English Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
English
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
English
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs English Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,985,462 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 21.9%, a difference of 35.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | English |
Minimum | 1.3% | 13.3% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.7% | 86.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 38.4% |
Median | 16.1% | 24.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 26.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to English by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Barbadian (21.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Scottish (21.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |