Chinese vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,756,092 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 5.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 45.3% |
Range | 41.7% | 42.5% |
Mean | 16.1% | 15.7% |
Median | 16.1% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and Thai (17.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |