Chinese vs English Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
COMPARE
Chinese
English
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Comparison
Chinese
English
16.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs English Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,869,699 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,616,305 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 0.090%.
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | English |
Minimum | 0.70% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.3% | 97.3% |
Mean | 20.0% | 23.8% |
Median | 16.8% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 22.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and English by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Kenyan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (16.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), European (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Dutch (15.9%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Kenyan (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (16.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sudan (16.0%, a difference of 0.32%), European (16.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Dutch (15.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Kenyans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.1% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Hmong | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 16.3% |