Chinese vs U.S. Virgin Islander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
U.S. Virgin Islander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
U.S. Virgin Islanders
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs U.S. Virgin Islander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,304,073 people shows no correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 24.2%, a difference of 49.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | U.S. Virgin Islander |
Minimum | 1.3% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 51.4% |
Range | 41.7% | 46.0% |
Mean | 16.1% | 25.0% |
Median | 16.1% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |