Chinese vs Immigrants from Denmark Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Denmark
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Denmark
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Denmark Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,190,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 20.5%, a difference of 27.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Denmark |
Minimum | 1.3% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.7% | 94.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 30.0% |
Median | 16.1% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 35.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 24.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |