Chinese vs English Kindergarten
COMPARE
Chinese
English
Kindergarten
Kindergarten Comparison
Chinese
English
98.5%
KINDERGARTEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.7%
KINDERGARTEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs English Kindergarten Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,307 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 98.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,981,412 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 98.7%, a difference of 0.13%.
Kindergarten Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | English |
Minimum | 96.6% | 93.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 3.4% | 6.7% |
Mean | 98.9% | 99.1% |
Median | 99.0% | 99.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.5% | 98.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 99.5% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and English by Kindergarten
In terms of kindergarten, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are French Canadian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), European (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Czech (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Swedish (98.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Scottish (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Dutch (98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Irish (98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Kindergarten |
English | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 98.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 98.7% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |