Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Subsaharan African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 62.5% |
Range | 47.1% | 61.7% |
Mean | 15.7% | 15.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |