Immigrants from Romania vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Subsaharan African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Sub-Saharan Africans
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,635,029 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 38.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 28.2% | 62.5% |
Range | 26.8% | 61.7% |
Mean | 8.4% | 15.6% |
Median | 6.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Belgium (7.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |