Immigrants from Western Africa vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Subsaharan African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Africa
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,059,325 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 62.5% |
Range | 28.4% | 61.7% |
Mean | 11.9% | 15.6% |
Median | 10.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |