Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Subsaharan African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Sub-Saharan Africans
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,618,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 54.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.4% | 99.4% |
Mean | 19.3% | 21.1% |
Median | 17.3% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 23.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Sub-Saharan Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |