Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Cherokee
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Cherokee
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
66.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,651,185 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 46.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 10.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 19.6% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 84.0% | 84.5% |
| Range | 64.4% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 48.8% | 40.3% |
| Median | 48.6% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.3% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iraqi (46.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (46.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Spanish (47.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Chileans | 69.8 /100 | #151 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 68.8 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 68.6 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
| Albanians | 68.6 /100 | #154 | Good 47.0% |
| Arabs | 68.6 /100 | #155 | Good 47.0% |
| Spanish | 68.1 /100 | #156 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 67.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
| Cherokee | 66.8 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
| Iraqis | 66.4 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 65.9 /100 | #161 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 65.4 /100 | #162 | Good 46.9% |
| Delaware | 64.7 /100 | #163 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 64.2 /100 | #164 | Good 46.9% |
| Samoans | 59.8 /100 | #165 | Average 46.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |