Celtic vs Ecuadorian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Ecuadorian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Ecuadorians
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Ecuadorian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,566,767 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 36.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 13.9% |
Range | 98.7% | 13.2% |
Mean | 8.7% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |