Celtic vs Indonesian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Indonesian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Indonesians
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Indonesian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,334,988 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 32.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Indonesian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.8% |
Range | 98.7% | 32.6% |
Mean | 8.7% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |