Celtic vs Cuban Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Cuban
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Cubans
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Cuban Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,866,425 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 42.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Cuban |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 16.2% |
Range | 98.7% | 15.6% |
Mean | 8.7% | 7.5% |
Median | 5.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Haitian (6.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.72%), Central American (6.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |