Celtic vs Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Crow
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Crow
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,050,450 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 100.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Crow |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 45.0% |
| Range | 98.7% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 14.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 10.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 6.7%), Apache (9.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |