Celtic vs Ecuadorian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Ecuadorian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Celtics
Ecuadorians
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Ecuadorian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,812,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 0.47%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 22.2% |
| Range | 48.7% | 15.7% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 16.2% |
| Median | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Ecuadorians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
| Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |