Celtic vs Immigrants from Hungary Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,814,844 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.548 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic	Immigrants from Hungary
Minimum	1.3%	0.92%
Maximum	100.0%	17.9%
Range	98.7%	17.0%
Mean	8.7%	4.9%
Median	5.4%	4.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	2.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.4%	5.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	4.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.1%	3.9%

Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Hungary by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%