Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Crow
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Crow
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,495,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,050,450 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 102.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Crow |
Minimum | 0.53% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 45.0% |
Range | 10.8% | 42.1% |
Mean | 4.6% | 14.0% |
Median | 4.1% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 10.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 6.7%), Apache (9.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |