Bangladeshi vs Spanish American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Spanish American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Spanish Americans
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Spanish American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,161,919 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 0.97%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Spanish American |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.0% | 98.6% |
Mean | 16.6% | 20.4% |
Median | 15.6% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 23.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Spanish Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |