Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Nicaragua
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,787 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 56.3% |
Range | 29.0% | 55.7% |
Mean | 16.6% | 16.6% |
Median | 15.6% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |