Arab vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arab
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Arabs
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,122,689 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arab | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Minimum | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 52.0% |
Range | 48.1% | 46.9% |
Mean | 23.1% | 19.9% |
Median | 19.2% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |