Argentinean vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Luxembourgers
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 7.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 52.1% |
| Range | 51.2% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 21.8% |
| Median | 17.8% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |