Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Luxembourgers
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 5.6% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 52.1% |
Range | 56.9% | 41.9% |
Mean | 27.0% | 21.8% |
Median | 21.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.4% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |