Argentinean vs Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Canadian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Canadians
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 10.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Canadian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 13.6% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.2% | 86.4% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 39.9% |
| Median | 17.8% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 53.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 21.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |