Immigrants from Nepal vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Luxembourgers
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,480,601 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 0.87%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 6.3% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 52.1% |
| Range | 56.2% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 21.8% |
| Median | 20.5% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |