Ethiopian vs Ugandan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Ugandan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Ugandans
43.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Ugandan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,091,132 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 28.9% | 23.4% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 81.0% |
| Range | 51.5% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 46.2% | 47.4% |
| Median | 43.6% | 45.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 38.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Ugandans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Nigerian (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Shoshone (43.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |