Ethiopian vs Polish Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Polish
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Poles
43.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Polish Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,091,132 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,940,539 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 48.5%, a difference of 12.5%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Polish |
Minimum | 28.9% | 19.1% |
Maximum | 80.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.5% | 80.9% |
Mean | 46.2% | 53.2% |
Median | 43.6% | 50.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 56.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 15.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Nigerian (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (43.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (48.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (48.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Samoans | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Irish | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |