Osage vs Ugandan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Osage
Ugandan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Osage
Ugandans
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Ugandan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 46.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 6.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 35.1% | 23.4% |
| Maximum | 68.9% | 81.0% |
| Range | 33.8% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 51.3% | 47.4% |
| Median | 49.4% | 45.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 38.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.3% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Nonimmigrants (46.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iraqi (46.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Delaware (46.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
| Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
| Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
| Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
| Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
| Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
| Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
| Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 69.9 /100 | #165 | Good 46.8% |
| Cherokee | 65.7 /100 | #166 | Good 46.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Shoshone (43.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American (43.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.1% |
| German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |