Immigrants vs Ugandan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants
Ugandan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants
Ugandans
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
43.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Ugandan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,047,094 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 46.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 5.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Ugandan |
Minimum | 18.2% | 23.4% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 81.0% |
Range | 61.8% | 57.6% |
Mean | 46.7% | 47.4% |
Median | 47.1% | 45.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.1% | 38.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.7% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (46.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (46.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (46.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (46.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South Americans | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 55.7 /100 | #171 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 54.6 /100 | #172 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 52.0 /100 | #173 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Shoshone (43.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American (43.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.1% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.1% |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |